Political polarization during COVID-19 was 12 times greater than past outbreaks in terms of vaccine hesitancy.
COVID-19 polarization 12x higher than past outbreaks in vaccine hesitancy.
Why it matters
- Political polarization during COVID-19 was significantly higher than in past disease outbreaks.
- This polarization affects risk perceptions, compliance with preventive measures, and vaccine uptake.
- Understanding this can help design more effective public health strategies.
By the numbers
- 12 times greater polarization in vaccine hesitancy during COVID-19.
- 5 times greater polarization in concern about infection.
- Study analyzed 170 polls spanning 13 outbreaks over nearly 70 years.
The big picture
- Polarization during COVID-19 was unprecedented and not explained by gradual partisan separation over time.
- Political identity influences how people perceive health threats and act to protect themselves and their communities.
What they're saying
- Commenters blame politicization, internet algorithms, and political leaders for downplaying the pandemic.
- Some highlight the challenges faced by healthcare workers due to misinformation and distrust.
Caveats
- Past approaches to reducing societal divisions may not be effective.
- More research is needed on strategies to reunify partisans.
- The study highlights the need for public health messaging that considers the political landscape.
What’s next
- Additional research on strategies to reunify partisans is urgently needed.
- Public health messaging needs to consider the political landscape and bridge partisan gaps.