Scientists abandon X for Bluesky due to declining professional value
Scientists are leaving X in significant numbers, finding Bluesky more effective for professional engagement.
Why it matters
- Scientists are shifting from X to Bluesky due to changes in X's platform policies and perceived decline in professional value.
By the numbers
- 813 individuals participated in the survey.
- 75% found X much less useful for networking and science communication.
- 66% found X less helpful for keeping up with developments in their field.
- Only 11% still actively use X.
- Nearly 40% have deleted their X accounts.
The big picture
- This shift indicates a significant change in how scientists interact online, with potential implications for networking, outreach, and staying updated on research.
What they're saying
- Some users mention leaving X due to changes in its platform policies and perceived increase in extremism.
- A Ph.D. student notes that about 90% of the researchers they follow have abandoned X.
Caveats
- The survey was limited to users who had already made the switch from X to Bluesky or were using both platforms.
- The survey was shared primarily through one author’s network, which may reflect the perspectives of those within particular academic communities more than others.
What’s next
- Future research could explore whether Bluesky can support the same level of diversity that once defined the science community on X and whether Bluesky can maintain momentum over time.